The name of the liquid-cooled energy storage system

The implications of technology choice are particularly stark when comparing traditional air-cooled energy storage systems and liquid-cooled alternatives, such as the PowerTitan series of products made by Sungrow Power Supply Company. Among the most immediately obvious differences between the two storage technologies is container size.

Liquid-cooled battery energy storage systems provide better protection against thermal runaway than air-cooled systems. “If you have a thermal runaway of a cell, you've got this massive heat sink for the energy be sucked away into. The liquid is an extra layer of protection,” Bradshaw says.

The reduced size of the liquid-cooled storage container has many beneficial ripple effects. For example, reduced size translates into easier, more efficient, and lower-cost installations. “You can deliver your battery unit fully populated on a big truck. That means you don't have to load the battery modules on-site,” Bradshaw says.

The advantages of liquid cooling ultimately result in 40 percent less power consumption and a 10 percent longer battery service life. The reduced size of the liquid-cooled storage container has many beneficial ripple effects. For example, reduced size translates into easier, more efficient, and lower-cost installations.

In the U.S., public policy is also an important driver of more ambitious energy storage deployments.

By 2030, that total is expected to increase fifteen-fold, reaching 411 gigawatts/1,194 gigawatt-hours. An array of drivers is behind this massive influx of energy storage. Arguably the most important driver is necessity. By 2050, nearly 90 percent of all power could be generated by renewable sources.